Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026)
Special Issue: The Qur’ān and the Turkic World

Special Issue: The Qur’ān and the Turkic World: Context and Interpretation

Towards A Holistic Framework For Scientific Exegesis: A Comparative Methodological Study of Elmalili M. Hamdi Yazir and Tantawi Jawhari

https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v11i2.1123

Published 20.04.2026

  • Norain Azlan
    • ,
  • Mohd Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff
    • ,
  • Sedek Bin Ariffin
Norain Azlan
University of Malaya, Malaysia

Mohd Zulkifli Mohd Yusoff
University of Malaya, Malaysia

Sedek Bin Ariffin
University of Malaya, Malaysia

Abstract

Scientific exegesis (tafsir ilmi), which connects Qur’anic verses with scientific discoveries, remains a significant discourse in contemporary Islamic scholarship, particularly concerning its methodology and interpretive validity. This study contributes to this area by analysing and comparing the methodological approaches of Elmalılı Hamdi Yazır and Tantawi Jawhari in interpreting the Qur’anic verses on creation (ayat al-khalq) based on Hak Dini Kur’an Dili and al-Jawahir fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim. Employing a qualitative research method and thematic analysis, the study focuses on three key themes: the creation of the universe, the heavens, and the earth. Findings reveal that Elmalılı adopts a rational-theological approach rooted in the kalam tradition and emphasises balance between revelation and reason, whereas Tantawi applies an empirical-reformist approach, employing science as an instrument of da‘wah and intellectual renewal. Both affirm the harmony between revelation and science as manifestations of Divine unity. The synthesis of these two approaches offers a balanced epistemological framework that integrates revelation, reason, and empirical experience. Based on these findings, the study proposes the Holistic Scientific Exegesis Framework (HSEF)—an integrative model uniting naql (revelation), ‘aql (reason), and tajrībah (empirical observation). Future research is recommended to assess the effectiveness of HSEF in Islamic education, particularly in developing a holistic model of scientific literacy that balances cognitive, affective, and spiritual dimensions.

Keywords

Scientific exegesis, Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır, Tantawi Jawhari, Qur’anic hermeneutics, epistemology of revelation, Holistic Scientific Exegesis Framework (HSEF)

PDF

References

  1. Abas, Mohd Hafizullah bin Md. “Haiwan dalam al-Qur’an Menurut Tafsir Ilmi: Kajian terhadap Lebah, Semut dan Labah-Labah” [Animals in the Qur’an According to Scientific Exegesis: A Study on the Bee, the Ant, and the Spider]. Master’s diss., Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2015.
  2. Ahmad Hilmi, Ahmad Bazli, Zulkifli Hj. Mohd Yusoff, and Zulkarnin Zakaria. “The Meaning in Kawniyyat Verses Based on Science-Oriented Exegesis: An Evaluation of the English Translation.” International Journal of Quranic Research 8, no. 1 (2016): 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/quranica.vol8no1.1
  3. Akhtar, Qayyum. “Comparison Between Sheikh Tantawi Johri and Muhammad Matwali
  4. al-Sha‘rawi about Cosmic Verses of the Qur’an.” PhD diss., Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan, 2009.
  5. Albayrak, Halis. “Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır’ın Tefsir Anlayışı” [Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır’s Approach to Qur’anic Exegesis]. In Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır Sempozyumu, 155–74. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, 1993.
  6. Albayrak, Ismail. “Turkish Exegeses of the Twentieth Century: Hak Dini Kur’an Dili.” Islamic Studies 43, no. 3 (2004): 391–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52541/isiri.v43i3.4776
  7. Amir, Ahmad Nabil. “Metode Tafsir al-ʿIlmi (Saintifik) antara Kitab al-Jawahir fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim dan Tafsir al-Manar” [The Method of Scientific Exegesis between al-Jawahir fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim and Tafsir al-Manar]. International Social Science and Humanities Journal 1, no. 4 (2018): 28–44.
  8. Amir, Selamat bin. “Elemen Saintik dalam al-Qur’an: Analisis terhadap Tafsir al-Sha‘rawi karangan Muḥammad Mutawalli al-Sha‘rawi” [Scientific Elements in the Qur’an: An Analysis of al-Sha‘rawi’s Tafsir by Muhammad Mutawalli al-Sha‘rawi]. PhD diss., University of Malaya, 2016.
  9. Ansari, Zafar Ishaq. “Scientific Exegesis of the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 3, no. 1 (2001): 91–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2001.3.1.91
  10. Armainingsih. “Studi Tafsir Saintifik: Al-Jawahir fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Karim Karya Syeikh Tantawi Jauhari [Scientific Exegesis Study: The Jewels in the Exegesis of the Noble Qur’an by Shaykh Tantawi Jawhari]. Jurnal At-Tibyan 1, no. 1 (2016): 94–117.
  11. ʿAwaḍ, Bakar Zakī Ibrāhīm. Al-Tafsir al-Ilmi li al-Ayat al-Kawniyyah: Tarikhuhu – Mawaqif al-Ulama Minhu [The Scientific Exegesis of the Cosmological Verses: Its History and the Scholarly Positions Toward it]. Qatar University, Faculty of Sharia and Islamic Studies, 1992.
  12. Dahman, Abd al-Aziz. Al-Irshadat al-Manhajiyyah ila Tafsir al-Ayat al-Kawniyyah [Methodological Directions for Interpreting Qur’anic Cosmological Verses]. Dar al-Nafaʾis, 2005.
  13. Daneshgar, Majid. “An Analytical Study on Two Modern Approaches to Science in the Qur’an: Tantawi and Bucaille.” PhD diss., University of Malaya, 2013.
  14. Daneshgar, Majid. Tantawi Jawhari and the Qur’an: Tafsir and Social Concerns in the Twentieth Century. Routledge, 2017.
  15. Daneshgar, Majid. “The Qur’an and Science, Part I: The Premodern Era,” Zygon 58, no. 4 (2023): 952–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12931
  16. El-Huli, Emin. Kur’an Tefsirinde Yeni Bir Metod [A New Method in Qur’anic Exegesis]. Kur’an Kitaplığı, 1995.
  17. Ersöz, İsmet. “Elmalılı Hamdi Yazır ve Tefsirinin Özellikleri” [A New Method in Qur’anic Exegesis]. In Elmalılı M. Hamdi Yazır Sempozyumu, 169. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 1993.
  18. Ersöz, Resul. “The Influence of Classical Islamic Modernism on the Qur’an Comments: The Example of Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır.” Amasya İlahiyat Dergisi 13, no. 13 (2019): 259–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18498/amailad.601373
  19. Firdaus, Muhammad. “Tafsir Ayat Kauniyyah Perspektif Thanthawi Jauhari dalam Tafsir al-Jawahir fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karīm” [Cosmological Verses in the Qur’an: Tantawi Jawhari’s Perspective in al-Jawahir fiTafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim]. Basha’ir: Jurnal Studi al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 4, no. 1 (2024): 55–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/revelatia.v4i1.6736
  20. Firmansyah, Rizki, Norman, Efrita, Romli, Moh., and, Permana, Yudi“Urgensi Tafsir Ilmi di Masa Modern: Tanggapan Zaghlul An-Najjar pada Kritikus Tafsir Ilmi di dalam Kitabnya Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Kauniyah fi al-Qur’an al-Karim” [The Urgency of Scientific Exegesis in the Modern Era: Zaghlul An Najjar’s Response to the Critics of Scientific Exegesis in His Work Tafsir of the Cosmological Verses in the Noble Qur’an]. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal 5, no. 6 (2023): 3632–48.
  21. Ghani, Muhamad Hafizuddin, Moktar, Mohd Sufian, Wan Nor Anas, Wan Nur Izzati, and Md Ali, Abdul Wahab. “Integration of Revelation and Science in the Context of al-Tafsir al-ʿIlmi: An Overview.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 14, no. 12 (2024): 3337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i12/24310
  22. Gunasti, Susan. The Qur’an Between the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic: An Exegetical Tradition. Routledge, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429442759
  23. Guénon, Melanie. “Science, Religion, and the Limits of Scientific Exegesis,” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 21, no. 3 (2019): 32–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2019.0398
  24. Güven, Mustafa. “The Opinions Elmalılı Muhammad Hamdi Yazır about Islamic Modernism and in this Context the Criticisms Directed to Muhammad Abduh – At the Example of Sûra al-Fîl.” Ekev Akademi Dergisi 19, no. 61 (2015): 141–70.
  25. Huda, Ade Naelul. Tafsir Ilmi: Telaah Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Kauniyah dalam al-Qur’an [Scientific Exegesis: A Study of the Tafsir of Cosmological Verses in the Qur’an]. Edited by Muhammad Azizan Fitriana. Penerbit Wahana Resolusi, 2022.
  26. Hurram Shahi, Baha’ al-Din. Al-Tafsir wa al-Tafasir al-Hadithah [Exegesis and Modern Commentaries]. Dār al-Rauḍah, 1991.
  27. Ibrahim, Mohamed Akhiruddin bin. “Pentafsiran Ayat Kawniyyah: Kajian terhadap Metodologi Muḥammad al-Amin al-Harari dalam Tafsir Ḥada’iq al-Rawḥ wa al-Rayḥan fi Rawabi ʿUlum al-Qur’an” [Interpretation of Cosmological Verses: A Study of Muhammad al-Amin al-Harari’s Methodology in Tafsir Gardens of the Soul and the Breeze in the Meadows of Qur’anic Sciences]. PhD diss., University of Malaya, 2013.
  28. Ibrahim, Mohamed Akhiruddin, Mohd Yakub @ Zulkifli Hj. Mohd Yusoff, and Azniwati Abdul Aziz. “Transformasi Epistemologi Kajian Ayat Kawniyyah: Tinjauan Terhadap Karya Era Klasik dan Moden dalam Bahasa Arab” [Epistemological Transformation in the Study of Qur’anic Cosmological Verses: An Examination of Classical and Modern Scholarship]. Al-ʿAbqari Journal 2 (2012): 39–62.
  29. Ismail, Ahmad Thaqif, and Aqdi Rofiq Asnawi. “Scientific Approach in Quranic Exegesis: The Emergence and Issues.” Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies 7, no. 1 (2021): 59–83.
  30. Jabir, M. Mohammed. “Methodology of al-Razi and Tantawi in Interpreting the Qur’an 3:190: An Analysis.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Thought for Specialized Research 5, no. 1 (2022): 55–87.
  31. Jawhari, Tantawi. Al-Jawahir fi Tafsir al-Qur’an al-Karim al-Mushtamil ‘ala ‘aja’ib bada’i‘ al-mukawwinat wa-ghara’ib al-ayat al-bahirat [The Jewels in the Exegesis of the Noble Qur’an, Containing the Marvels of Creation and the Wonders of the Radiant Verses]. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Salām Shāhīn. Vols. 1-24. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2004.
  32. Johnson, Kathryn A., Morris A. Okun, and Jordan W. Moon. “The Interaction of Faith and Science Mindsets Predicts Perceptions of the Relationship Between Religion and Science.” Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 4 (2023): 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100113
  33. Karsli, Ibrahim Hilmi. “Some Remarks on Scientific Interpretation of the Qur’an.” Diyanet İlmi Dergi 46, no. 3 (2010): 79–94.
  34. Khir, Bustami Mohamed. “The Qur’an and Science: The Debate on the Validity of Scientific Interpretations.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 2, no. 2 (2000): 1–20.
  35. Al-Khuli, Amin. Al-Tafsir: Ma‘alim Hayatihi Manhajuhu al-Yawm [Exegesis: The Milestones of his Life and his Contemporary Methodology]. Al-Hayʾah al-Miṣriyyah al-ʿAmmah li al-Kitab, 2003.
  36. Mahmūd, Muhammad Abd al-Halim. “Al-Ayat al-Kawniyyah al-Qur’aniyyah wa Tatbiqatuhā al-Tarbawiyyah fi Ta‘ziz al-Thaqafah al-‘Ilmiyyah [Qur’anic Cosmological Verses: Pedagogical Applications for the Enhancement of Scientific Culture]. PhD diss., Faculty of Basic Education, University of Diyala, 2013.
  37. Mir, Mustansir. “Scientific Exegesis of the Qur’an—A Viable Project?” Islam and Science 2, no. 1 (2004): 33–42.
  38. Mohammed, Adel, and Mohammed Fadl. “The Eighth Study: The Scientific Tafsir of the Holy Qur’an in the Twentieth Century.” International Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences 71, no. 2 (2022): 292–329.
  39. Naguib, Shuruq. “The Hermeneutics of Miracle: Evolution, Eloquence, and the Critique of Scientific Exegesis in the Literary School of Tafsir.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 21, no. 3 (2019): 57–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2019.0399
  40. Al-Nayfar, Ḥamīdah. Al-Tafsir al-ʿIlmi: Min Tantawi Jawhari ila Abi Ḥamid al-Ghazali [Scientific Exegesis: From Tantawi Jawhari to Abu Ḥamid al-Ghazali]. Al-Maʿhad al-Aʿla li al-Ḥadarah al-Islamiyyah, 1994.
  41. Noor, Ahmad Yunus Mohd. “Islamic Scientific Exegesis Endeavor: An Introduction.” In Revelation & Science in the 21st Century, edited by Esam Eltigani Mohamed Ibrahim and Raudlotul Firdaus Fatah Yasin, 170–80. International Islamic University Malaysia, 2015.
  42. Özer, Venhar. “Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır’in Fahreddîn er-Razi’den Etkilenmesi ve Yararlanması” [Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır’s Being Influenced and Benefit from Fahreddin er-Razi]. Master’s diss., Erciyes University, 2021.
  43. Özgel, İshak. “Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır’ın Tefsiri ve Hakkında Yapılmış Çalışmalar Bibliyografyası” [Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır’s Tafsir and a Bibliography of Studies Conducted on it]. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi 19 (2012): 327–62.
  44. Rahman, Mizanur, and Abu Talib Mohammad Monawer. “Methodology of Tantawi Jawhari and Zaghloul Naggar in the Scientific Interpretation of the Holy Qur’an: A Comparative Study.” In The 1st International Conference on Islam and Contemporary Issues in the Muslim World: Challenges and Way Forward (ICIC 2016), 104–36. Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya, 2016.
  45. Rahman, Siti Noor Mawar Abdul, and Azrin Ibrahim. “Thematic Analysis of ʿAql in the al-Qur’an.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 9, no. 11 (2019): 921–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i11/6611
  46. Al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din. Mafatih al-Ghayb [The Keys to the Unseen]. Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-Arabi, 1999.
  47. Al-Razi, Ibn Abi Hatim. Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim [Exegesis of the Great Qur’an]. Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 2018.
  48. Saleh, Sujiat Zubaidi. “Epistemologi Penafsiran Ilmiah al-Qur’an” [Epistemology of Scientific Exegesis of the Qur’an]. Jurnal Tsaqafah 7, no. 1 (2011): 109–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v7i1.112
  49. Salih, Fathi. Al-‘Aqd al-Jawhari fi Manaqib al-Shaykh Tantawi Jawhari li-Tilmidhih Zakariyya Ahmad Rashdi al-Iskandari [The Jewelled Necklace on the Virtues of Shaykh Tantawi Jawhari by his Student Zakariyya Ahmad Rashdi al-Iskandari]. Mu’assasah al-Bina’ al-Insani wa al-Tanmiyah, 2000.
  50. Shabana, Ayman. “In Pursuit of Consonance: Science and Religion in Modern Works of Tafsir.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 55, no. 4 (2019): 7–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2019.0397
  51. Shomad, Bukhori, and Munirul Abidin. “Rethinking Islam: Inspiring Qur’an for Conducting Scientific Research.” Hamdard Islamicus 43, no. 1–2 (2020): 314–23.
  52. Sıcak, Ahmet Sait, and Recep Bilgin. “Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi Yazır (1878–1942) and a Bibliography of Research on his Literature (1923–2018).” Turkish Studies – Social Sciences 14, no. 2 (2019): 329–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.22489
  53. Tabari, Muhammad b. Jarir. Tarikh al-Rusul wa-l-Muluk [The History of Prophets and Kings]. Edited by Muhammad Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim. 2nd ed. Dar al-Ma‘arif, 1967.
  54. Yahya, Sarinah binti Haji. Tafsir ‘Ilmi (Āyāt-Āyāt Kawniyyāt) MABIMS: Mengenali Metode dan Aliran Tafsir al-Qur’an Saintifik [Scientific Tafsir of Cosmological Verses: Exploring the Methodologies and Currents of Qur’anic Scientific Exegesis]. MABIMS, 2023.
  55. Yalçinkaya, M. Alper. “‘Science,’ ‘Religion,’ and ‘Science-and-Religion’ in the Late Ottoman Empire.” Zygon 54, no. 4 (2019): 1050–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12563
  56. Yazır, Elmalılı Muhammed Hamdi. Hak Dini Kur’an Dili [The Qur’an in the Language of Divine Truth]. Vols. 1-8. Eser Neşriyat, 1971.
  57. Zargar, Nazir Ahmad. “Between ʿAql and Naql: Negotiating Reason and Revelation in the Islamic Intellectual Tradition.” Maqolat: Journal of Islamic Studies 3, no. 3 (2025): 398–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58355/maqolat.v3i3.161
  58. Zirikli, Khayr al-Din. Al-A‘lam: Qamus Tarajim li-Ashhar al-Rijal wa-al-Nisa’ min al-‘Arab wa-al-Musta‘rabin wa-al-Mustashriqin [The Notables: A Biographical Dictionary of the Most Famous Men and Women among the Arabs, Arabized, and Orientalists]. 7th ed. Dar al-‘Ilm li al-Malayin, 1984.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.