Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026)
Special Issue: The Qur’ān and the Turkic World

Special Issue: The Qur’ān and the Turkic World: Context and Interpretation

The Māturīdī Tradition of Tafsīr : Representatives, Reception and Doctrinal Development

https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v11i2.1179

Published 20.04.2026

  • Philipp Bruckmayr
Philipp Bruckmayr
Univeristy of Bamberg

Abstract

Despite increasing scholarly interest in the Māturīdī school of dialectic theology and Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī’s Qur’an commentary among scholars of the history of kalam (rational theology) and tafsīr (Qur’anic exegesis), respectively, comparatively little attention has been devoted so far to the role of Qur’anic exegesis among later representatives of the school and to its relevance for the elaboration and transmission of Māturīdī thought in general. Accordingly, this article sketches the history of the Māturīdī tradition of Qur’anic exegesis. After discussing al-Māturīdī’s foundational Taʾwīlāt ahl as-Sunna and its relevance for the formulation and dissemination of his doctrines, it turns to the tafsīr works of later major Māturīdī scholars, most notably Najm al-Dīn al-Nasafī and Abū l-Barakāt al-Nasafī. It presents an overview of the history and impact of Māturīdī(-influenced) Qur’anic interpretation until the 19th century, as reflected in independent tafsīr works as well as in glosses and super-glosses to earlier texts of the genre, including to popular non-Māturīdī titles, such as al-Zamakhsharī’s al-Kashshāf and al-Bayḍāwī’s Anwār al-Tanzīl. Thereby, it is shown that the field of tafsīr has been an important locus for the assertion, elaboration and transmission of Māturīdī thought.

Keywords

tafsīr, kalām, ʿaqīda, Māturīdiyya, al-Māturīdī, al-Nasafī

PDF

References

  1. Abdurahmanov, Ikhtiyar. “Codicological Description of the Manuscripts of ‘Sharh At-Ta’wilat’ by Alauddin Samarkandi.” Information Horizons: American Journal of Library and Information Science 2, no. 5 (2024): 108–11.
  2. Ahmed, Asad Q., and Margaret Larkin. “The Ḥāshiya and Islamic Intellectual History.” Oriens 41, no. 3-4 (2013): 213–16. https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-13413401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-13413401
  3. Ahmed, Shahab, and Nenad Filipovic. “The Sultan’s Syllabus: A Curriculum for the Ottoman Imperial Medreses prescribed in a Fermān of Qānūnī I Süleymān, dated 973 (1565).” Studia Islamica 98/99 (2004): 183–218.
  4. Al-Ālūsī, Abū l-Thanāʾ. Rūḥ al-maʿānī fī tafsīr al-qurʼān [The Spirit of the Meanings in the Exegesis of the Qur’an]. Edited by ʿAlī ʿAbd al-Bārī ʿAṭiyya. 16 vols. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1994–1996.
  5. Badeen, Edward. Sunnitische Theologie in Osmanischer Zeit [Sunnī Theology in Ottoman Times]. Ergon, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783956506864
  6. Bashir, Kamran. The Qurʾan in South Asia: Hermeneutics, Qurʾan Projects, and Imaginings of Islamic Tradition in British India. Routledge, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003185208
  7. Al-Bayāḍī, Kamāl al-Dīn. Ishārāt al-marām min ʿibārāt al-imām Abī Ḥanīfa al-Nuʿmān [The Desired Signs from the Statements of Abū Ḥanīfa al-Nuʿman]. Edited by Aḥmad Farīd al-Mizyadī. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2007.
  8. Al-Bazdawī, Abū l-Yusr Muḥammad b. Muḥammad. Uṣūl al-Dīn [The Sources of Religion]. Edited by Hans-Peter Linss. Maktabat al-Azharīya li-t-turāth, 2003.
  9. Berger, Lutz. “Interpretations of Ashʿarism and Māturīdism in Mamluk and Ottoman Times.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, edited by Sabine Schmidtke, 693–703. Oxford University Press, 2016.
  10. Brigaglia, Andrea. “Tafsīr and the Intellectual Tradition of Islam in West Africa: The Nigerian Case.” In Tafsīr and Islamic Intellectual History: Exploring the Boundaries of a Genre, edited by Andreas Görke and Johanna Pink, 379–415. Oxford University Press, 2014.
  11. Brockelmann, Carl. Geschichte der Arabischen Litteratur: Zweiter Supplementband [The History of Arabic Literature]. Brill, 1938.
  12. Brodersen, Angelika. “Abū l-Barakāt an-Nasafī.” In Handbook of Qurʾānic Hermeneutics. Vol. 3: Qurʾānic Hermeneutics from the 13th to the 19th Century, edited by Georges Tamer, 107–19. De Gruyter, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111320083-006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111320083-006
  13. Brodersen, Angelika. Der Unbekannte Kalām: Theologische Positionen der Frühen Māturīdīya am Beispiel der Attributenlehre [The Unknown kalām: Theological Positions of the early Māturīdiyya as Exemplified by the Teachings on the Attributes]. LIT, 2014.
  14. Brodersen, Angelika. “Göttliches und Menschliches Handeln im Māturīditischen Kalām” [Divine and Human Acts in Māturīdī Kalām]. Jahrbuch für Islamische Theologie und Religionspädagogik 2 (2013): 117–39.
  15. Brodersen, Angelika. Tradition und Transformation in der Māturīdīya des 6./12. Jahrhunderts. Mit einer Kritischen Edition des Kitāb al-Kifāya fī l-hidāya fī uṣūl ad-dīn des Aḥmad b. Maḥmūd b. Abī Bakr Nūr ad-Dīn aṣ-Ṣābūnī al-Ḥanafī al-Buḫārī (gest. 580/1184) [Tradition and Transformation within the Mātuīdiyya of the 6th/12th Century: With a Critical Edition of the Kitāb al-Kifāya fī l-Hidāya fī Uṣūl al-Dīn of Aḥmad b. Maḥmūd b. Abī Bakr Nūr al-Dīn aṣ-Ṣābūnī al-Ḥanafī al-Buḫārī (d. 580/1184)]. Brill, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004513358_004
  16. Brodersen, Angelika. Zwischen Māturīdīya und Ašʿarīya: Abū Šakūr as-Sālimī und sein Tamhīd fi Bayān at-Tauḥīd [Between Māturīdiyya and Ashʿariyya: Abū Shakūr al-Sālimī and his Tamhīd fī Bayān al-Tawḥīd]. Gorgias Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463240240
  17. Bruckmayr, Philipp. “At the Intersection of Uṣūl al-Fiqh and Kalām: The Commentary Tradition on Ṣadr al-Sharī‛a al-Thānī’s al-Muqaddimāt al-Arba‛.” Journal of Islamic Philosophy 14 (2023): 17–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/islamicphil2023142
  18. Bruckmayr, Philipp. “Past and Present Aspects of Māturīdism in South and Southeast Asia.” In Uluğ Bir Çinar İmâm Mâturîdî Uluslararası Sempozyum Tebliğler Kitabı, edited by Ahmet Kartal, 123–31. Ofis Yayın Matbaacılık, 2014.–
  19. Bruckmayr, Philipp. “Salafī Challenge and Māturīdī Response: Contemporary Disputes over the Legitimacy of Māturīdī Kalām.” Welt des Islams 60, no. 2-3 (2020): 293–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700607-06023P06
  20. Bruckmayr, Philipp. “The Spread and Persistence of Māturīdī Kalām and Underlying Dynamics.” Iran and the Caucasus 13, no. 1 (2009): 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1163/160984909X12476379007882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/160984909X12476379007882
  21. Al-Bursawī, Ismāʿīl Ḥaqqī. Rūḥ al-bayān [The Spirit of Elucidation]. 3 vols. Al-Maṭbaʿa al-ʿĀmira, 1839.
  22. Correa, Dale J. “Taking a Theological Turn in Legal Theory: Regional Priority and Theology in Transoxanian Ḥanafī Thought.” In Locating the Sharīʿa, ed. Sohaira Z.M. Siddiqui, 111–26. (Brill, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391710_009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391710_009
  23. Demiri, Lejla, Phil Dorroll and Dale Correa, eds. Māturīdī Theology: A Bilingual Reader. Mohr Siebeck, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-161286-2
  24. El Shamsy, Ahmed. “The Ḥāshiya in Islamic Law: A Sketch of the Shāfiʿī Literature,” Oriens 41, no. 3-4 (2013): 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-13413404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-13413404
  25. Fragner, Bert G. Die Persophonie: Regionalität, Identität und Sprachkontakt in der Geschichte Asiens [Persophonia: Regionality, Identity and Language Contact in Asian History]. Das Arabische Buch, 1999.
  26. Götz, Manfred. “Māturīdī und sein Kitāb Taʼwīlāt al-Qurʼān” [Māturīdī and his Kitāb Taʾwīlat al-Qur’an]. Der Islam 41 (1965): 27–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/islm.1965.41.1.27
  27. Gunasti, Susan. “Political Patronage and the Writing of Qurʾān Commentaries among the Ottoman Turks.” Journal of Islamic Studies 24, no. 3 (2013): 335–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/ett024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/ett024
  28. Al-Ḥabashī, ʿAbdallāh Muḥammad. Jāmiʿ al-shurūḥ wa-l-ḥawāshī [The Compendium of Commentaries and Glosses]. 5 vols. Dār al-Minhāj, 2017.
  29. Ḥabbūsh, Māhir Adīb. “Muqaddimat al-Taḥqīq” [Introduction to the Edition]. In Abū Ḥafṣ al-Nasafī, At-taysīr fī l-tafsīr, edited by Māhir Adīb Ḥabbūsh, vol. 1. 15 vols. Dār al-Lubāb, 2019.
  30. Haidar, Yahya Raad. “The Debates between Ashʿarism and Māturīdism in Ottoman Religious Scholarship: A Historical and Biographical Study.” PhD diss., Australian National University, 2016.
  31. Hamza, Feras, Sajjad Rizvi and Farhana Mayer, eds. An Anthology of Qur’anic Commentaries. Vol. 1: On the Nature of the Divine. Oxford University Press, 2008.
  32. Al-Ḥasanī, ʿAbd al-Ḥayy b. Fakhr al-Dīn. Nuzhat al-khawāṭir wa-bahjat al-masāmiʿ wa-l-nawāẓir [The Promenade of Thoughts and the Delight for the Ears and Eyes]. 8 vols. Idārah Tālīfāt-i Ashrafiyya, 1991–1993.
  33. Al-Hindī al-Ḥanafī, ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq. Al-iklīl ʿalā madārik at-tanzīl wa-ḥaqāʾiq at-taʾwīl li-l-imām an-Nasafī [The Crown on “The Grasp of Revelation and the Truths of Interpretation” of Imam al-Nasafī]. Edited by Muḥyī al-Dīn al-Bayraqdār. 7 vols. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2012.
  34. Hoffman, Valerie J., and Sulaiman bin Ali bin Ameir Al-Shueili, “Ibāḍī Tafsīr Literature.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qurʾanic Studies, edited by Mustafa Shah and Muhammad Abdel Haleem, 734-745. Oxford University Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.013.63
  35. Ibn al-Tamjīd, Muṣṭafā. “Ḥāshiyat Ibn al-Tamjīd”. [The Gloss of Ibn al-Tamjīd]. In ʿIṣām al-Dīn Ismāʿīl al-Qūnawī, Ḥashiyat al-Qūnawī ʿalā Tafsīr al-Imām al-Bayḍāwī, edited by ʿAbdallāh Maḥmūd Muḥammad ʿUmar. 20 vols. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2001.
  36. İzgi, Cevat. Osmanlı Medreselerinde İlim: 1. Riyazî İlimler [The Sciences in Ottoman Madrasas: 1. Mathematical Sciences]. İz Yayıncılık, 1997.
  37. Izutsu, Toshihiko. The Concept of Belief in Islamic Theology: A Semantic Analysis of Îmân and Islâm. Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, 1965.
  38. Kam, Hureyre. “Die Duale Epistemologie al-Māturīdīs” [Al-Māturīdī’s Dual Epistemology]. In Rationalität in der islamischen Theologie, Band I: Die klassische Periode, edited by Maha El Kaisy-Friemuth, Reza Hajatpour and Mohammed Abdel Rahem, 293–323. De Gruyter, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110588576-016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110588576-016
  39. Karimov, Jamoliddin. “Study of the Heritage of Imam Maturidi at the Imam Maturidi International Scientific Research Center: Analysis and Prospective Plans.” EPRA International Journal of Research and Development 9, no. 6 (2024): 623–28.
  40. Kāshifī, Ḥusayn Wāʿiẓ. Jawāhir al-tafsīr [Jewels of Exegesis]. Edited by Jawād ʿAbbāsī. Markaz-i Nashr-i Mīrāth-i Maktūb, 2000.
  41. Al-Khafājī, Shihāb al-Dīn. Ḥāshiyat al-Shihāb al-musammāt ʿināyat al-qāḍī wa-kifāyat al-rāḍī ʿalā Tafsīr al-Bayḍāwī [The Gloss of al-Shihāb Called “The Grace of the Judge and the Comforting Sufficiency regarding the Exegesis of al-Bayḍāwī]. 8 vols. Dār Ṣādir, n.d.
  42. Khan, Mofakhkhar Hussain. The Holy Qurʾān in South Asia: A Bio-Bibliographic Study of Translations of the Holy Qurʾān in 23 South Asian Languages. Bibi Akhtar Prakãšanî, 2001.
  43. Knysh, Alexander. “Ṣūfism and the Qurʾān.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, vol. 5, 137–59. Brill, 2006.
  44. Koç, Mehmet Akif. “On the Allegedly Overstated Importance of aṭ-Ṭabarī (d. 310/922) within the Sunnī Exegetical Tradition: An Answer to Walid Saleh.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 173, no. 2 (2023): 343–358. https://doi.org/10.13173/ZDMG.173.2.343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13173/ZDMG.173.2.343
  45. Kutlu, Sönmez, ed. İmam Mâturîdî ve Maturidilik [Imam Māturīdī and the Māturīdiyya], 3rd ed. Otto, 2012.
  46. Lane, Andrew J. A Traditional Muʿtazilite Qurʾān Commentary. The Kashshāf of Jār Allāh al-Zamakhsharī (d. 538/1144). Brill, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047417767
  47. Madelung, Wilferd. “Abū l-Muʽīn al-Nasafī and Ashʽari Theology.” In Studies in Honour of Clifford Edmund Bosworth. Vol. 2. The Sultanʼs Turret: Studies in Persian and Turkish Culture, edited by Carole Hillenbrand, 318–30. Brill, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004491991_018
  48. Madelung, Wilferd. “The Spread of Māturīdism and the Turks.” In Actas do IV Congresso de Etudos Arabes e Islâmicos: Coimbra-Lisboa, 1 a 8 de setembro de 1968. Brill, 1971.
  49. Al-Māturīdī, Abū Manṣūr. Kitāb at-Tawḥīd [The Book of Divine Unity]. Edited by Bekir Topaloğlu and Muhammed Aruçi. İSAM, 2005.
  50. Al-Māturīdī, Abū Manṣur. Taʾwīlāt al-Qurʾān [Interpretations of the Qurʾān]. Edited by A. Vanlıoğlu et al. 18 vols. Mızan Yayınevi, 2005–2011.
  51. Mol, Arnold Yasin. “Divine Respite in the Ottoman Tafsīr Tradition: Reconciling Exegetical Approaches to Q.11:117.” In Osmanlı’da İlimler Dizisi: Osmanlı'da İlm-i Tefsir, edited by M.T. Boyalık and H. Abacı, 539–92. İSAR, 2019.
  52. Moqbel, Tareq. “The Reception of Ibn ʿArabī in Sunnī Tafsīr: Akbarian Discourse in al-ʾĀlūsī’s Rūḥ al-maʿānī.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 174, no. 2 (2024): 341–64. https://doi.org/10.13173/ZDMG.174.2.341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13173/ZDMG.174.2.341
  53. Muminov, Ashirbek. “Die Bedeutung der Handschriften aus der ‘Bibliothek des Ḫwāja Muḥammad Pārsā’ für die Erforschung des ḥanafitischen Gelehrtenmilieus von Buḫārā” [The Relevance of the Manuscripts of the ‘Library of Ḫwāja Muḥammad Pārsā’ for Research on the Ḥanafī Scholarly Milieu of Bukhara]. Manuscripta Orientalia 9, no. 3 (2003): 59–62.
  54. Nafi, Basheer M. “Abu al-Thanaʾ al-Alusi: An Alim, Ottoman Mufti, and Exegete of the Qurʾan,” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 34, no. 3 (2002): 465–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743802003033.
  55. Al-Nasafī, ʿAbdallāh b. Aḥmad. Tafsīr al-Nasafī: Madārik al-tanzīl wa-ḥaqāʾiq al-taʾwīl [Al-Nasafī’s Exegesis: The Grasp of Revelation and the Truths of Interpretation]. Edited by Marwān Muḥammad al-Shaʿār. 4 vols. Dār al-nafāʾis, 2009.
  56. Al-Nasafī, Abū l-Barakāt. Sharḥ al-ʿUmda fī ʿaqīdat ahl as-sunna wa-l-jamāʿa al-musammā bi-l-iʿtimād fī l-iʿtiqād [The Commentary on the Summation of the Creed of the People of the Sunna and the Community Known as “The Validation of the Articles of Belief”]. Edited by ʿAbdallāh Muḥammad ʿAbdallāh Ismāʿīl. Maktabat al-Azhariyya li-l-Turāth, 2014.
  57. Al-Nasafī, Abū Ḥafṣ. At-Taysīr fī l-Tafsīr [The Facilitator in Exegesis]. Edited by Māhir Adīb Ḥabbūsh. 15 vols. Dār al-Lubāb, 2019.
  58. Al-Nasafī, Abū Ḥafṣ. Tafsīr-i Nasafī [Nasafī’s Exegesis]. Edited by ʿAzīzallāh Juwaynī. 2 vols. Intishārāt-i Bunyād-i Farhang-i Īrān, 1974.
  59. Nawʽī, Yaḥyā b. ʿAlī. “Risāla fī l-farq bayna madhhab al-Ashāʿira wa-l-Māturīdiyya” [Epistle on the Difference between the Ashʿarī and Māturīdī Schools]. In Sunnitische Theologie in Osmanischer Zeit, edited by Edward Badeen, 26–29. Ergon, 2008.
  60. En-Nesefî, Necmüddîn Ömer. Et-Teysîr fi’t-Tefsîr: Ömer Nesefî Tefsiri 1. Cilt [The Facilitator in Exegesis: ʿUmar al-Nasafī’s Exegesis Volume 1]. Edited by Muhammed Coşkun. Türkiye Yazma Eserler Kurumu Başkanlığı, 2019.
  61. Al-Nīsābūrī, Maḥmūd b. Abī l-Ḥasan. Bāhir al-burhān fī maʿānī mushkilāt al-Qur'ān: Muqaddimat taḥqīq kitāb Bāhir al-burhān - al-dirāsa [The Splendid Proof Concerning the Meanings of the Difficulties Passages of the Qur’an: Editorial Introduction to the Book “Bāhir al-burhān” – The Study]. Edited by Suʿād bt. Ṣāliḥ Bā Biqī. 3 vols. Jāmiʿat Umm al-Qurā, 1997–1999.
  62. Obuchi, Hisashi. “ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Samarqandī’s Non-Realist Approach to Good (Ḥasan) and Bad (Qabīḥ): Moral Ontology in Sixth/Twelfth-Century Māturīdī Theology and Legal Theory.” Journal of Islamic Ethics 8 (2024): 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-20240008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-20240008
  63. Peacock, A. C. S. Arabic Literary Culture in Southeast Asia in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Brill, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004548794
  64. Pessagno, J. Meric. “Irāda, Ikhtiyār, Qudra, Kasb: The View of Abū Manṣur al-Māturīdī.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 104, no. 1 (1984): 177–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/602649
  65. Al-Qāyinī an-Nasafī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Naṣāʾiḥ-i Shāhrukhī [The Admonitions for Shāhrukh]. Cod. A.F. 112. Austrian National Library Vienna, 1417.
  66. Ross, Samuel J. “What were the Most Popular Tafsīrs in Islamic History? Part 1: An Assessment of the Manuscript Record and the State of Tafsīr Studies,” Journal of Qur'anic Studies 25, no. 3 (2023): 1–54. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2023.0555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2023.0555
  67. Rudolph, Ulrich. Al-Māturīdī & die Sunnitische Theologie von Samarkand [Al-Māturīdī and the Sunnī Theology of Samarkand]. Brill, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004452138
  68. Rudolph, Ulrich. “Ḥanafī Theological Tradition and Māturīdism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, edited by Sabine Schmidtke, 280–98. Oxford University Press, 2016.
  69. Rudolph, Ulrich. “Ratio und Überlieferung in der Erkenntnislehre al-Ašʿarī’s und al-Māturīdī’s” [Reason and Transmission in the Epistemology of al-Ashʿarī and al-Māturīdī]. Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 142, no. 1 (1992): 72–89.
  70. Saleh, Walid A. “Al-Māturīdī (d. 333/944), Early Sunni Exegesis, and Muʿtazilism: Sura 67 and the Five Principles of Sunni Exegesis.” In Non Sola Scriptura: Essays on the Qur’an and Islam in Honour of William A. Graham, edited by Bruce Fudge, Kambiz GhaneaBassiri, Sarah Bowen Savant and Christian R. Lange, 153–68. Routledge, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003252221-10
  71. Saleh, Walid A. “Marginalia and Peripheries: A Tunisian Historian and the History of Qurʾanic Exegesis.” Numen 58, no. 2-3 (2011): 284–313. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852711X562326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852711X562326
  72. Saleh, Walid A. “Medieval Exegesis: The Golden Age of Tafsīr.” In The Oxford Handbook on Qurʾanic Studies, edited by Mustafa Shah and Muhammad Abdel Haleem, 666–81. Oxford University Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.013.6
  73. Saleh, Walid A. “Rereading Al-Ṭabarī through al-Māturīdī: New Light on the Third Century Hijrī.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 18, no. 2 (2016): 180–209. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2016.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2016.0242
  74. Saleh, Walid A. “The Gloss as Intellectual History: The Ḥāshiyahs on al-Kashshāf.” Oriens 41, no. 3-4 (2013): 217–59. https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-13413402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-13413402
  75. Saleh, Walid A. “The Qur’an Commentary of al-Bayḍāwī: A History of Anwār al-tanzīl.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 23, no. 1 (2021): 71–102. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2021.0451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2021.0451
  76. Sands, Kristin Zahra. “On the Popularity of Husayn Vaʿiz-i Kashifi’s Mavāhib-i ʿaliyya: A Persian Commentary on the Qurʾan.” Iranian Studies 36, no. 4 (2003): 469–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/021086032000139186
  77. Shaykhzādah, Muḥyī al-Dīn. Ḥāshiyat Muḥyī al-Dīn Shaykhzādah ʿalā tafsīr al-qāḍī al-Bayḍāwī [Muḥyī al-Dīn Shaykhzādah’s Gloss to the Exegesis of the Qadi al-Bayḍāwī]. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Qādir Shāhīn. 8 vols. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1999.
  78. Spooner, Brian, and William L. Hanaway, eds. Literacy in the Persianate World: Writing and the Social Order. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9781934536568
  79. Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Al-itqān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān [The Complete Guide to the Sciences of the Qurʾan]. Edited by Shuʿayb al-Arnaʾūṭ. Al-Risāla, 2008.
  80. Thānwī, Ashraf ʿAlī. Tafsīr bayān al-qurʾān [The Exegesis of the Elucidation of the Qur’an ]. 3 vols. Maktaba Raḥmaniyya, 2011.
  81. Ullah, Kifayat. Al-Kashshaf: Al-Zamakhshari’s (d. 538/1144) Mutazilite Exegesis of the Quran. De Gruyter, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110533408
  82. Yakubovych, Mykhaylo. “Ottoman Qur’anic Studies: Case of Tafsīr Glosses.” Rocznik Orientalistyczny 73, no. 1 (2020): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.24425/ro.2020.134044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24425/ro.2020.134044
  83. Al-Zabīdī, Murtaḍā. Itḥāf al-sadāt al-muttaqīn bi-sharḥ Iḥyāʾ ʿulūm al-din [The Gift of the Pious Nobles through the Commentary on “The Revival of the Religious Sciences”]. 10 vols. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1994.
  84. Zadeh, Travis. The Vernacular Qurʼan: Translation and the Rise of Persian Exegesis. Oxford University Press, 2012.
  85. Al-Zamakhsharī, Abū l-Qāsim Jār Allāh. Tafsīr al-kashshāf ʿan ḥaqāʾiq ghawāmiḍ al-tanzīl [The Exegesis of the Revealer of the Truths Concerning the Difficulties in the Revelation ]. Edited by Muḥammad ʿAbd al-Salām Shāhīn. 4 vols. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2015.
  86. Ziyadov, Shovosil. “Taschkenter Handschriften über das Milieu bucharischer Theologen in 13. und 14. Jahrhunderten” [Manuscripts from Tashkent on the Milieu of Bukharan Theologians in the 13th and 14th Centuries]. Manuscripta Orientalia 9, no. 3 (2003): 56–58.
  87. Al-Zurqānī, Muḥammad ʿAbd al-ʿAẓīm. Manāhil al-ʿirfān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān [Springs of Wisdom in the Sciences of the Qur’an]. Edited by Fawwāz Aḥmad Zamarlī. 2 vols. Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1995.
  88. Zysow, Aron. “Muʿtazilism and Māturīdism in Ḥanafī Legal Theory.” In Studies in Islamic Legal Theory, edited by Bernard G. Weiss, 235–65. Brill, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400851_013

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.