Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Terminological Drift and the Reordering of Knowledge from Al-Ghazali’s Perspective

Abstract

This article examines al-Ghazali’s (d. 505/1111) critique of terminological distortion in the Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn (The Revival of the Religious Sciences) as a diagnosis of epistemological disorder within the Islamic sciences. It argues that al-Ghazali understood semantic contraction not merely as a linguistic shift or rhetorical concern, but as a process that reshaped the hierarchy of knowledge, scholarly prestige, and the spiritual telos of learning. Focusing on five interrelated terms – fiqh (jurisprudence), ʿilm (knowledge), tawḥīd (the Oneness of God), dhikr/tadhkīr (remembrance/admonition), and ḥikmah (wisdom), the study traces a recurring pattern in which originally expansive concepts became narrowed through disciplinary capture, performative usage, or reduced doctrinal formulation. Methodologically, the article combines qualitative content analysis with close textual reading of the Kitāb al-ʿIlm (Book of Knowledge) and related passages in the Iḥyāʾ. It maintains interpretive discipline through repeated re-reading of chapters, cross-checking individual passages against the architecture of the Kitāb al-ʿIlm, and limiting claims to meanings explicitly supported by the text. The article concludes that al-Ghazali’s reflections on terminology are best understood as part of a wider sociology of the Islamic sciences, in which the governance of key terms helped order scholarly status, regulate authoritative knowledge, and shape the social life of learning in the Islamic Golden Age.

Keywords

al-Ghazali, Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn, terminological drift, Islamic epistemology, hierarchy of sciences, sociology of knowledge

PDF

References

  1. Dallal, Ahmad. “Ghazali and the Perils of Interpretation.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 122, no. 4 (2002): 773–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3217616
  2. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ghazali-perils-interpretation/docview/217139334/se-2.
  3. Garden, Kenneth. The First Islamic Reviver: Abu Hamid al-Ghazali and his Revival of the Religious Sciences. Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199989621.001.0001
  4. Al-Ghazali, Abū Ḥāmid. Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn [The Revival of the Religious Sciences]. Dār Ibn Ḥazm lil-Ṭibāʿah wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʿ, 2005.
  5. Gilʿadi, Avner. “On the Origin of Two Key-Terms in Al-Ġazzālī’s Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn.” Arabica 36 (1989): 81–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157005889X00232
  6. Griffel, Frank. Al-Ghazali’s Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331622.001.0001
  7. Hallaq, Wael. Law and Legal Theory in Classical and Medieval Islam. Routledge, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003278856
  8. Hourani, George. “Ghazālī on the Ethics of Action.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 96, no. 1 (1976): 69–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/599890
  9. Kadir, Surni. “Comparative Study of Al-Ghazali Thought and Ibn Rushd in the Perspective of Islamic Theology.” International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences 6, no. 3 (2024): 895–903.
  10. Kalin, Ibrahim. Knowledge in Later Islamic Philosophy: Mulla Sadra on Existence, Intellect, and Intuition. Oxford University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199735242.001.0001
  11. Kalin, Ibrahim. “Mulla Sadra’s Realist Ontology of the Intelligibles and Theory of Knowledge.” İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 7 (2002): 1–29. https://izlik.org/JA85KT32WK.
  12. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Goals and Purposes of Shariah: Maqasid in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197786390.001.0001
  13. Makdisi, George. “The Scholastic Method in Medieval Education: An Inquiry into its Origins in Law and Theology.” Speculum 49, no. 4 (1974): 640–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2852031
  14. Mardonov, Ravshan, Shoira Kubaeva, Ergasheva Makhbuba, Husan Muhamadiyev, and Azimov Sherzod. “Communication in Sufism: Situation, Problem, Solution (Based on the Teachings of Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali).” International Journal on Culture, History, and Religion 7, no. SI1 (2025): 1076–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63931/ijchr.v7iSI1.367
  15. Masud, Muhammad Khalid. Shatibi’s Philosophy of Islamic Law. Adam Publishers, 2006.
  16. Moosa, Ebrahim. Ghazali and the Poetics of Imagination. University of North Carolina Press, 2006.
  17. Mujahidin, Sultan. “The Supremacy of Revelation over Reason: Al-Ghazali’s Critique of Rationalist Philosophy in Tahafut Al-Falasifah.” Islamic Thought Review 2, no. 2 (2024): 151–162.
  18. Primarni, Amie, Etika Pujianti, Catherine Li, and Jasafat Jasafat. “Islamic Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphysical Problems: A Study of the Works of Ibn Sina and Al-Ghazali.” Journal of Noesantara Islamic Studies 2, no. 2 (2025): 73–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70177/jnis.v2i2.1848
  19. Ramli, Ahmad Faizuddin, and Awang, Jaffary. “Analyzing al‐Ghazali’s Perspective on Christianity: A Critical Examination of al‐Raddu al‐Jamīlu li Ilahiyyat ʿĪsā bi‐Ṣarīḥi al‐Injīli.” The Muslim World 115, no. 4 (2025): 251–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.70007
  20. Al-Raysuni, Ahmad. Imam al-Shatibi’s Theory of the Higher Objectives and Intents of Islamic Law. International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkjb1w9
  21. Ridha, Sofia. “Al-Ghazali’s Theory of Islamic Law and its Relevance in the Development of Usul Fiqh.” Al-Wadh’iyyah: Journal of Sharia Law and Legal Studies 1, no. 3 (2025): 131–143.
  22. Al-Shatibi, Ibrahim. Kitāb al-Muwāfaqāt li-Abi Ishaq al-Shatibi [The Book of Reconciliation by Abu Ishaq al-Shatibi]. 5 vols. Manshūrāt al-Bashīr Benaʿṭiyyah, 2017.
  23. Al-Shirazi, Ṣadr al-Din. Al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʿāliyah fī al-Asfār al-ʿAqliyyah al-Arbaʿah [The Sublime Wisdom in the Four Rational Journeys]. Vol. 1. Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1999.
  24. Treiger, Alexander. “Al-Ghazālī’s Classifications of the Sciences and Descriptions of the Highest Theoretical Science.” Dîvân: Disiplinler Arası Çalışmalar Dergisi 16, no. 30 (2011): 1–32.
  25. Yahya, Muhammad, Selfi Regina Putri, Ririn Mardana Putri, and Silva Ariady. “The Relevance of Al-Ghazali’s Thought to Modern Education: A Literature Review on Ethics, Morals, and Character Development.” Khalaqa: Journal of Education and Learning 3, no. 2 (2025): 182–197.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.