Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022)

Articles

Does Ellipsis Really Exist in the Qurʾān? SFL-based Perspective

https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v7i2.475

Published 02.12.2022

  • Zaid Alamiri
Zaid Alamiri
Independent Scholar

Abstract

Departing from Systemic Functional Linguistics, this study, which represents preliminary findings, asserts that ellipsis in the Qurʾān, as a grammatical cohesive device, does not tend to occur more frequently. Arabic linguistics, for its part, has approached ellipsis and continues from exclusive intra-sentence relations governed by syntactic rules. Understood as such, ellipsis doesn’t contribute to the cohesiveness of text― a notion absent in the Arabic linguistic tradition.  To compensate for the ellipsis’s contribution to text, the Qurʾān employs two other strategies; the cohesive relationship of Reference, and stylistic techniques.   The study shows that SFL-based ellipsis analysis is more productive and useful for understanding the mechanisms of text building elements than the syntactic approach.  However, more research is required to get a more thorough knowledge of ellipsis in the Qurʾān, which will eventually contribute to the ellipsis theory in the Arabic language.

Keywords

Ellipsis, Arabic Linguistic Tradition, Taqdīr, Cohesion, Systemic Functional Linguistics, Qurʾān

PDF

References

  1. Abu Lihya, Majdi. “An-Naḍm al Qurʾāni Fi Surat Hud. Dirasa Islubiya” [The Qurʾānic Construction in Surat HUD. A Stylistic Study]. Master’s diss., Islamic University of Gaza, 2009. https://ebook.univeyes.com/94280.
  2. Abu al-Makarem, ʿAli. Alḥaḏf Wa Taqdīr Fil n-Nahw al-ʿArabi [Ellipsis and Suppletive Insertion in Arabic Grammar]. Cairo: Dar Ġ Cai lil Ṭibaʿah wal našr wal Tawziʿ, 2007.
  3. al-Jurjānī, ʿAbdul Qahir. Dalāʾil a-Iʿjāz [Indications of the Inimitability of the Qurʾān]. Edited by Muhammad Šāker. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānchī, 1984.
  4. Alamiri, Zaid. “SFL-Based Analysis of Thematic Structure of the Qurʾān (19:41–50): Some Reflections.” The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 10 (2018): 21-52.
  5. Alamiri, Zaid. “The Register of the Qurʾānic Narratives: SFL-Based Preliminary Observations on Q19 (41–50).” The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 12 (2020): 93-116.
  6. Alamiri, Zaid. “Understanding the Qurʾān Textuality: A Preliminary SFL-based Analysis of the Qurʾān as Text.” The International Journal of Arabic Linguistics 6 (2020): 139-166.
  7. Alamiri, Zaid. “What Makes the Qurʾānic Narratives Cohesive? Systemic Functional Linguistics-Based Analysis of Reference Role: Some Reflections.” Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 16 (2016): 199-219.
  8. AlʿArfaj, Lubna. “Alḥaḏf Wa ʾaṯaruhu ʿala al-ʿMana Fi Namādhij Min Quṣat Ibrāhim -Maʿ Qawmihi” [The Type of Ellipsis and its Influence on Meaning in some Passages of Abraham Dialogue with his People]. Master’s diss., University of Umm Al-Qura, 2012. https://ebook.univeyes.com/96321.
  9. ʿAṭiya, Mukhtar. Al-I-jāz Fi Kalām al-ʿArab wa naṣ al-Iʿjāz [Inimitability of Arab Speech and the Succinctness of the Text]. Cairo: Dar al Maʿrifa aljāmiʿya, 1997.
  10. Baalbaki, Ramzi. The Legacy of the Kitāb: Sibawayhi’s Analytical Methods within the Context of the Arabic Grammatical Theory. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
  11. Beeston, Alfred F. L. Written Arabic: An Approach to the Basic Structures. Cambridge University Press, 1968.
  12. Boullata, Issa. “Literary Structures of the Qurʾān.” In Encyclopedia of the Qurʾān, edited by J. D. McAuliffe, vol. 3, 192-204. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
  13. Butler, Christopher. Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural Functional Theories, vol. 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2003.
  14. Carter, Michael. “Elision.” In Proceedings of the Colloquium on Arabic Grammar, edited by Kinga Dévényi and Tamás Iványi, 121-141. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Chair for Arabic Studies, 1991.
  15. Carter, Michael. Sībawayhi’s Principles. Arabic Grammar and Law in Early Islamic Thought. Lockwood Press, 2016.
  16. Christiansen, Thomas. Cohesion: A Discourse Perspective. Peter Lang, 2011.
  17. Dayyeh, Hanady. “The Relation between Frequency of Usage and Deletion in Sībawayhi’s Kitāb.” In The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics: Sibawayh and Early Arabic Grammatical Theory, edited by Amal Marogy, 75-98. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2012.
  18. Devenyi, Kinga. “Iḍmār in the Maʿānī of al-Farrā: A Grammatical Approach between Description and Explanation.” In Approaches to Arabic Linguistics, edited by Everhard Ditters and Harald Motzki, 45-64. Leiden: Brill, 2007.
  19. Gully, Adrian. Grammar and Semantics in Medieval Arabic. Curzon Press, 1995.
  20. Halliday, Michael. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold, 1978.
  21. Halliday, Michael. “Language Structure and Language Function.” In The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, vol. 1, edited by J. Webster, 173-195. Continuum, 1970/2002.
  22. Halliday, Michael. “On the Ineffability of Grammatical Categories.” In The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, vol. 1, edited by J. Webster, 291-322. Continuum, 1984/2002. Halliday, Michael, and Christian Matthiessen. Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2014.
  23. Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan. Cohesion in English. London: Longman, 1976.
  24. Halliday, Michael, and Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social Semiotic Perspective. OUP, 1989.
  25. Ḥammudah, Ṭaher. Ḍahirat al-Ḥaḏf Fi Al-Daras al-Lughawi [The Phenomenon of Ellipsis in the Linguistic Research]. Cairo: al-Dar al-Jamiʿyah lil našr wal Ṭibaʿah wal Tawziʿ, 1999.
  26. Hasan, Ruqiaya. “Language and Society in a Systemic Functional Perspective.” In Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, edited by Ruqiaya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen and Jonathan Webster, vol. 1, 55-80. London: Equinox, 2005.
  27. Hathaq, Salimah. “Al-Ḥaḏf wa Dalālātuhu Fi Al-Qurān. Suratā Ṭāhā wa Naml Inmudgān” [Ellipsis and its Signification in the Qurʾān. Surat Taha and an-Naml as an Example]. Master’s diss., University of Larbi Ben M’hidi of Oum El Bouaghi, 2013. http://bib.univ- oeb.dz:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6139.
  28. Ibn Hishām, ʾAbū Muḥammad. Mughnī al-labīb an Kutub al-Aʿārīb [The Book that allows the Wise Man to dispense with all other Books on Iʿrāb]. Edited by A. M. Al-Khaṭīb. Kuwait: Al-Majlis al-waṭanī lil-ṯaqāfa wa’l-funūn wa’l-ʾādāb, 2000.
  29. Ibn Jinnī, Abū l-FatḥʿUṯmān. Al-Khaṣāʾiṣ. Edited by M. A. Al-Najjār. Cairo: Dār al-kutub al- Miṣriyah, 1960.
  30. Ibn Manẓur, Muhammad. Lisān al-ʿArab [Language of the Arabs]. Edited by A. M. ʿAbdul Wahab and M. S. al-‘Ubaidy. Beirut: Dar ‘Ihia at-Turaṯ al-Arabi and Muaʾssasat at-Tarix al-ʿArabi, 1999.
  31. Jād Alkareem, ʿAbdullah. Al-ikhtiṣār Simat al-ʿArabiya [Briefing is the Characteristic Feature of Arabic Language]. Cairo: Maktabat al-ʾādāb, 2006.
  32. Johns, Anthony. “The Qurʾānic Presentation of the Joseph Story: Naturalistic or Formulaic Language?” In Approaches to the Qurʾān, edited by G. Hawting and ʿA. A. Shareef, 37-69. London: Routledge, 2013.
  33. Khallafallah, Muhammad. al-Fan al-Qaṣaṣṣy Fi al-Qurʾān al-Kareem [The Narrative Art in the Qurʾān]. Cairo: Sina lil nashar & Dar alintishār alʿArabi, 1999.
  34. Mackay, Floyd. Ibn Qutayba’s Understanding of Qurʾānic Brevity. Master’s diss., McGill University, 1991.
  35. Mahmudi, Shuaib. “Bunyat an-Naṣ Fi Surat al-Kahf. Muqārabah Naṣṣiya lil Itisāq Wa Siyāq” [The Structure of Surat al-Kahf: A Textual Approach to Cohesion and Context]. Master’s diss., Mentouri University of Constantine, 2010. https://ebook.univeyes.com/100717.
  36. Marogy, Amal E. Kitāb Sībawayhi Syntax and Pragmatics. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2010.
  37. Matthiessen, Christian. “Theme Enabling Resource Ideational ‘Knowledge’ Construction.” In Thematic Development in English Texts, edited by M. Ghadessy, 20-54. London, New York: Pinter, 1995.
  38. Mir, Mustansir. “Irony in the Qurʾān: A Study of the Story of Joseph.” In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qurʾān, edited by Issa Boullata, 173-187. London: Routledge, 2000.
  39. Mir, Mustansir. “Qurʾān as Literature.” Religion & Literature 2 (1988): 49-64.
  40. Mir, Mustansir. “The Qurʾān Story of Joseph: Plot, Themes, and Characters.” The Muslim World 76 (1986): 1-15.
  41. Morley, G. David. Syntax in Functional Grammar: An Introduction to Lexicogrammar in Systemic Linguistics. London, New York: Continuum, 2000.
  42. Oucif, Rahima. “Ḍahirat al-Ḥaḏf Fi al Qurʾān. Taṭbiq ʿalā Surat an-Nissā” [The Phenomenon of Ellipsis in the Qurʾā: An Application on Surat an-Nisā]. Journal of alIʾhya 6, no. 21 (2018): 143-160. https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/52909.
  43. Rahman, Yousef. “Ellipsis in the Qurʾān: A Study of Ibn Qutayba’s Taʾwil Mashkil al-Qurʾān.” In Literary Structures of Religious Meaning in the Qurʾān, edited by Issa Boullata, 277-291. London: Routledge, 2000.
  44. Ryding, Karin. A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  45. Ṣaḥn, Ahmad. “Rūʾya Qurʾāniya ʿan al-Ḥaḏf” [A Qurʾānic Perspective on Ellipsis]. Journal of Basra Arts 61 (2012): 1-25.
  46. Sībawayhi, ʾAbū Bishr ʿAmr b. ʿUṯmān b. Qanbar al-Baṣrī. al-Kitāb. Edited by ʿA. S. Hārūn. Cairo: Maktabat al-khānchī, 1988.
  47. Solimando, Cristina. “Ellipsis in the Arabic Linguistic Thinking (8th-10th Century).” In The Word in Arabic, edited by Giuliano Lancioni and Lidia Bettini, 85-108. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2011.
  48. Tatu, Silviu. Qatal//Yiqtol (Yiqtol//Qatal) Verbal Sequence in Semitic Couplets. Gorgias Ugaritic Studies 3. Gorgias Press, 2008.
  49. Versteegh, Kees. Landmarks in Linguistic Thought III: The Arabic Linguistic Tradition. London: Routledge, 1997.
  50. Versteegh, Kees. “The Notion of Underlying Levels in the Arabic Grammatical Tradition.” Historiographia Linguistica 21 (1994): 271-296.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.