Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023)

Articles

Retracing Islamic Prohibition on Genetic Gestational Surrogacy (Uterine Service) for Married Couples: Scientific and Analogical Perspective

https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v8i1.553

Published 10.06.2023

  • Ayesha Alvi
    • ,
  • Mohammed Rizwan
Ayesha Alvi
Group Head, Centre for Study and Research, New Delhi, India

Mohammed Rizwan
Group Head, Centre for Study and Research, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Assisted reproduction involving third party (sperm, ova or uterus) in the procreation has invited fierce debate amongst Muslim scholar’s world over and the two main theological schools of Islam; Shia and Sunni responded to it differently. In Shia Islam it is practice, while Sunni Islam prohibited it and this prohibition enjoys the endorsement of leading religious clergies (Ulemas) across spectrum.

This paper opens up a novel paradigm with regards to prohibition on availing uterine service to gestate embryo created from the gametes of married intended couple for developmental purpose (genetic gestational surrogacy) from analogical and scientific reference in conjunction to Quranic citation; taking into consideration that wet nursing and gestational surrogacy both are societal services and share certain undeniable biogenesis characteristic. The argument is novel in our knowledge and has not been so comprehensively put forth in written form with such explicit scientific evidences before. The parallels between genetic gestational surrogacy and wet nursing/foster motherhood are discussed, with special reference to mainstream arguments of purity of lineage, sanctity (Hurmat) of surrogate women and sacredness of womb etc.

The key aspects of gestational surrogacy and wet nursing are also elaborated alongside certain departure points between contemporary surrogacy and Islam inspired surrogacy.

Keywords

Assisted reproductive technology, Islamic perspective, Surrogacy, Wet nursing

PDF

References

  1. Abbasi-Shavazi, Mohammad Jalal, Marcia C. Inhorn, Hajiieh Bibi Razeghi-Nasrabad and Ghasem Toloo. “The Iranian ART Revolution: Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Third-party Donation in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 4, no. 2 (2008): 1-48.
  2. Abu-rabia, Aref. “Infertility and Surrogacy in Islamic Society: Socio-Cultural, Psychological, Ethical, and Religious Dilemmas.” The Open Psychiatry Journal 6 (2013): 54-60. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101306010054.
  3. Aflatoonian, Nastaran, Maryam Eftekhar, Behrooz Aflatoonian, Elham Rahmai and Abass Aflatoonian. “Surrogacy as a Good Option for Treatment of Repeated Implantation Failure: A Case Series.” Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine 11, no. 1 (2013): 77-80.
  4. Al-Bar, Mohammed Ali, and Hassan Chamsi-Pasha. Contemporary Bioethics: Islamic Perspective. New York: Springer International, 2015. eBook edition.
  5. al-Bukhari, Muhammad. Sahih al-Bukhari. Translated by M. Muhsin Khan. https://sunnah.com/bukhari/.
  6. Alghrani, Amel. “Womb Transplantation and the Interplay of Islam and the West.” Journal Religion and Science 48, no. 3 (2013): 618-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12037.
  7. Al-Mubarak, Tawfique. “Surrogacy and Islam: Between Permissibility and Prohibition.” Islam and Civilisational Renewal 5 (2014): 277-281.
  8. al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. Fatawa Mu’asirah [Contemporary Fatawa]. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami, 2000.
  9. Atighetchi, Dariusch. “The Development of Organ Transplants.” In Islamic Bioethics: Problems and Perspectives, 161-197. Springer, 2007. http://eknygos.lsmuni.lt/springer/ 237/161-197.pdf.
  10. Atighetchi, Dariusch. “Problems of Islamic Bioethics and Biolaw.” Derecho y Religion 2, (2007): 221-229.
  11. Ber, Rosalei. “Ethical Issues in Gestational Surrogacy.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21, no. 2 (2000): 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009956218800.
  12. Brännström, Matts, Pernilla D. Kähler, Robert Greite, Johan Mölne, César Díaz-García and Stefan G. Tullius. “Uterus Transplantation: A Rapidly Expanding Field.” Transplantation 102, no. 4 (2018): 569-577. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002035.
  13. Carlson, Bruce M. Human Embryology and Developmental Biology, 6th ed. USA: Elsevier, 2018. eBook edition.
  14. Clarke, Morgan. “Shiite Perspectives on Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies.” ISIM Review 17 (2006): 26-27.
  15. Daxinger, Lucia, and Emma Whitelaw. “Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: More Questions than Answers.” Genome Research 20, no. 12 (2010): 1623-1628. eBook edition. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.106138.110.
  16. El-Hak, Gad. “In Vitro Fertilization and Test Tube Baby.” Fatwa, vol. 1225, 3213-3228. Cairo, Egypt: Dar El Iftaa, 1980.
  17. El-Khuffash, Afif, and Sharon Unger. “The Concept of Milk Kinship in Islam: Issues raised when offering Preterm Infants of Muslim Families Donor Human Milk.” Journal of Human Lactation 28, no. 2 (2012): 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334411434803.
  18. Fadel, Hossem, E. “The Islamic Viewpoint on New Assisted Reproductive Technologies.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 30, no. 1 (2002): 147-157.
  19. Farid, Mohammed S., and Paul Schotsmans. “Gamete Donation: Ethical Divergences in Islamic Religious Thinking.” Asian Bioethics Review 16, no. 1 (2014): 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1353/ASB.2014.0005.
  20. Field, Martha. “Reproductive Technologies and Surrogacy: Legal Issues.” Creighton Law Review 25, no. 5 (1992): 1589-1598.
  21. Firoozabadi, Mehdi D., and Mohammad A. Sheikhi. “Breastfeeding from Qur’an to Medical Science.” International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review 3, no. 7 (2015): 134-137.
  22. Georgadaki, Katerina, Nikolas Khoury, Demetrios A. Spandidos and Vasilis Zoumpourlis. “The Molecular Basis of Fertilization.” International Journal of Molecular Medicine 38, no. 4 (2016): 979-86. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2723.
  23. Ghamadi Center of Islamic Learning. “Surrogacy in Islam, Surrogate Motherhood – Javed Ahmed Ghamidi.” YouTube video, 12:42, December 4, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=KYtZpAwUrVE.
  24. Ghamidi, Javed A. Islam: A Comprehensive Introduction, 5th ed. Pakistan: Al-Mawrid, 2012.
  25. Giladi, Avner. “Breast-Feeding in Medieval Islamic Thought: A Preliminary Study of Legal and Medical Writings.” Journal of Family History 23, no. 2 (1998): 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/036319909802300201.
  26. González, Noelia Igareda. “Legal and Ethical Issues in Cross-border Gestational Surrogacy.” Fertility Sterility 113, no. 5 (2020): 916-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020. 03.003.
  27. Goswami, Gajendra K. “The Genetic Truth of Surrogate Parentage.” Medical Legal Journal 83, no. 4 (2015): 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817215576877.
  28. Gürtin, Zeynep. “Banning Reproductive Travel? Turkey’s ART Legislation and Third-party Assisted Reproduction.” Reproduction BioMed Online 23, no. 5 (2011): 555-565.
  29. Husain, Fatima A. “Reproductive Issues from the Islamic Perspective.” Human Fertility 3, no. 2 (2000): 124-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727002000198831.
  30. Haeri, Shaela. Law of Desire: Temporary Marriage in Shi’i Iran. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1989.
  31. Inhorn, Marcia C. “Cosmopolitan conceptions in global Dubai? The Emiratization of IVF and its consequences”. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 2 (2016): 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.04.004.
  32. Inhorn, Marcia C. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446195.
  33. Inhorn, Marcia C. “Making Muslim Babies: IVF and Gamete Donation in Sunni Versus Shi‘a Islam.” Culture Medicine Psychiatry 30 (2006): 427-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013- 006-9027-x.
  34. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Soraya Tremayne. Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shi’ah Perspectives. New York: Berghahn, 2012. eBook edition. https://doi.org/10.3167/9780857454904.
  35. Inhorn, Marcia C., and Soraya S. Tremayne. “Islam, Assisted Reproduction, and the Bioethical Aftermath.” Journal of Religion Health 55, no. 2 (2016): 422-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0151-1.
  36. Inhorn, Marcia C., Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli, Soraya Tremayne and Zeynep Gürtin. “Assisted Reproduction and Middle East Kinship: A Regional and Religious Comparison.” Reproduction Biomedicine Society Online 8 (2017): 41-51. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.06.003.
  37. Islamic Organization of Education, Science and Culture (ISESCO). Ethical Reflection of Advanced Genetic Research. Doha, Qatar: ISESCO, 1993.
  38. Jain, Meaghan, and Manvinder Singh. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Techniques. Treasure Island, FL: Statpearls Publishing, 2021.
  39. Larijani, Bagher, and Farzaneh Zahedi. “Ethical and Religious Aspects of Gamete and Embryo Donation and Legislation in Iran.” Journal of Religion and Health 46, no. 3 (2007): 399- 408.
  40. Lasker, Shamima P., and Marcello Ghilardi. “Genetic Gestational Surrogacy: Hope for Muslims.” Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 8, no. 3 (2017): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3329/ bioethics.v8i3.35680.
  41. Leroux, Christine, Mathilde Lea Cherve and J. Bruce German. “Perspective: Milk MicroRNAs as Important Players in Infant Physiology and Development.” Advances in Nutrition 12, no. 5 (2021): 1625-1635. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab059.
  42. Manji, Rizwan A., Alan H. Menkis, Burcin Ekser and David K. C. Cooper. “Porcine Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: The Next Generation.” American Heart Journal 164, no. 2 (2012): 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.011.
  43. Melnik, Bodo C., and Gerd Schmitz. “Milk’s Role as an Epigenetic Regulator in Health and Disease.” Diseases 5, no. 1 (2017): art. 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases5010012.
  44. Muaygil, Ruaim A. “Reexamining the Prohibition of Gestational Surrogacy in Sunni Islam.” Developing World Bioethics 17, no. 2 (2017): 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb. 12133.
  45. Niers, Laetitia, Marianne Stasse-Wolthuis, Frans M. Rombouts and Ger T. Rijkers. “Nutritional Support for the Infant’s Immune System.” Nutrition Review 65, no. 8 pt 1 (2007): 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1301/nr.2007.aug.347-360.
  46. Notta, James P., Elizabeth A. Bonney, James D. Pickering and Nigel A. B. Simpson. “The Structure and Function of the Cervix during Pregnancy.” Translational Research in Anatomy 2 (2016): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2016.02.001.
  47. Ozkan, Hasan, Funda Tuzun, Abdullah Kumral and Nurray Duman. “Milk Kinship Hypothesis in Light of Epigenetic Knowledge.” Clinical Epigenetics 4 (2012): art. 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-4-14.
  48. Padela, Aasim I., Katherine Klima and Rosie Duivenbode. “Producing Parenthood: Islamic Bioethical Perspectives & Normative Implications.” New Bioethics 26, no. 1 (2020): 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2020.1729575.
  49. Sato, Fumiaki, Soken Tsuchiya, Stephen J. Meltzer and Kazuharu Shimizu. “MicroRNAs and Epigenetics.” The FEBS Journal 278, no. 10 (2011): 1598-1609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08089.x.
  50. Serour, Gamal I. Embryo Research: Ethical Implications in the Islamic World. Rabat, Morocco: ISESCO, 2002.
  51. Serour, Gamal I, and A. R. Omran. Ethical Guidelines for Human Reproduction Research in the Muslim Worlds. Cairo: The International Islamic Centre for Population Studies and Research, 1992.
  52. Serour, Gamal I. Ethical Implications of the use of ART in the Muslim World. Cairo: The International Islamic Centre for Population Studies and Research, 1997.
  53. Serour, Gamal I. Ethical Implications of the use of ART in the Muslim World: Update. Cairo: The International Islamic Centre for Population Studies and Research, 2000.
  54. Serour, Gamal I., Mohamed A. Aboulghar and Raaga T. Mansour. “Bioethics in Medically Assisted Conception in the Muslim World.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12, no. 9 (1995): 559-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212574.
  55. Sharma, B. R. “Forensic Considerations of Surrogacy: An Overview.” Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine 13, no. 2 (2006): 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.002.
  56. Spyroulis, Christos, Khadeeja Naqvi, Marco Gaudoin and Al-Inizi Shamma. “Superfetation: A Surrogate Dilemma.” Journal Case Report Images Obstetrics Gynecology 7 (2021): art. 100075Z08CS2021.
  57. Taylor, Bridget. “Whose Baby is it? The Impact of Reproductive Technologies on Kinship.” Human Fertility Cambridge England 8, no. 3 (2005): 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 14647270500277693.
  58. Torres, Gloria, Anne Shapiro and Tim K. Mackey. “A Review of Surrogate Motherhood Regulation in South American Countries: Pointing to a Need for an International Legal Framework.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19 (2019): art. 46.
  59. Wang, Yuping, and Shuang Zhao. Vascular Biology of the Placenta. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Life Science, 2010.
  60. Wright, Matthew. “Surrogate Forced to Fight for Custody for her own Son after Rare Condition Caused her to Fall Pregnant with Twin – One of them is Hers,” Daily Mail, October 28, 2017, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5026195/American- surrogate-battled-Chinese-couple-custody.html.
  61. Xiao, Changchun, and Klaus Rajewsky. “MicroRNA Control in the Immune System: Basic Principle.” Cell 136, no. 1 (2009): 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.027.
  62. Zaami, Simo. “Assisted Heterologous Fertilization and the Right of Donor Conceived Children to know their Biological Origins.” Clinical Therapeutics 169, no. 1 (2018): e39-e43. https://doi.org/10.7417/T.2018.2052.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.