Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

A Brief Review of Classical and Modern Tafsir Trends and Role of Modern Tafasir in Contemporary Islamic Thought

Abstract

This article briefly reviews traditional and modern tafsirtrends and how moderntafasirhave shaped contemporary Islamic thought. Classical tafsirtrends, tafsir bi al-ma’thur (tradition-based interpretation) and tafsir bi al-ra’y(reason-based interpretation), are well-documented in historical norms of Qur’ānic exegesis. However, modernity, with its complex socioeconomic, religious, political and cultural developments, presents unique challenges to muffassirun(authors of Qur’ānic interpretations) to contextualise the Qur’ānic message and provide guidance to modern-day Muslims and their worldview. Complex modern Islamic thought is a selection of ideologies and philosophies that resulted from the prevailing diverse geopolitical, sociocultural and economic environment. These dynamic elements of modernity have conceptualised tafsirtrends into the textualist, contextualist, modernist, socio-political, scientific, thematic and feminist approaches. These trends have not only transformed contemporary Islamic thought, and vice versa, but also continue to collectively evolve to meet the challenges of modernity.

Keywords

Contemporary Islamic thought, Modern trends in Quranic exegesis, Classical tafsir trends, Modernity, Qur'an

PDF

References

  1. Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Schools of Qur’ānic Exegesis: Genesis and Development. New York: Routledge, 2010. http://www.centuryassociation.org/download/quranic_course_2016/ SCHOOLS%20OF%20QURANIC%20EXEGESIS-RAOF.pdf.
  2. Abu-Zayd, Nasr. “The Dilemma of the Literary Approach to the Qur'an.” Journal of Comparative Poetics 23 (2003): 8-47. doi:10.2307/1350075.
  3. Albayrak, Ismail. “Qur’ānic Narrative and Isra’iliyyat in Western Scholarship and in Classical Exegesis.” PhD diss., The University of Leeds, 2000. http://etheses. whiterose.ac.uk/507/1/uk_bl_ethos_365456.pdf.
  4. Boullata, Issa J. “Modern Qur’ān Exegesis: A Study of Bint al-Shati’s Method.” The Muslim World 64, no. 2 (1974): 103-113. Accessed December 30, 2017. http://web.a.ebscohost. com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=b56887b8-45f3-4ede-a3 e8-fd10106859ec%40sessionmgr4006.
  5. Campanini, Massimo. “Qur’ānic Hermeutics and Political Hegemony: Reformation of Islamic Thought.” The Muslim World 99 (2009): 124–133. doi:10.1111/j.1478-1913. 2009.01257.x.
  6. Çoruh, Hakan. “Tradition, Reason, and Qur’ānic Exegesis in the Modern Period: The Hermeneutics of Said Nursi.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 28, no. 1 (2007): 85- 104. doi: 10.1080/09596410.2017.1280915.
  7. Dogan, Recep. Usul al-Tafsir: The Sciences and Methodology of the Qur’ān. New Jersey: Tughra Books, 2014.
  8. Dogan, Serdar. “The Influence of Modern Science on Bediuzzaman Said Nursi's thinking.” Islamic Sciences 12, no. 1 (2014): 3-42. Accessed October 30, 2017. http://web.a. ebscohost.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=118d4dc5- 7f88-4067-8b3c-651d91fb70d5%40sessionmgr4010.
  9. Hidayatullah, Aysha. “History of Tafsir.” In Feminist Edges of the Qu’ran, by Aysha Hidayatullah, 1-20. USA: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2014. Accessed November 2, 2017. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359561.003.0002.
  10. Howe, Justine. “Interpreting the Qur’ān in the US: Religious Pluralism, Tradition, and Context.” Journal of Qur’ānic Studies 18, no. 3 (2016): 34-69. doi: 10.3366/jqs. 2016.0249.
  11. Ibrahim, Azhar. “Contemporary Islamic Thought: A Critical Perspective.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 23, no. 3 (2012): 279-294. doi: 10.1080/09596410.2012. 676781.
  12. International Institute of Islamic Thought. “Policies and Guidelines for Research Application.” http://www.iiit.org/policies--guidelines.html.
  13. Iqbal, Muzaffar. “Muslims and Western Studies of the Qur’ān: The Qur’ān in the Contemporary World.” Islam and Science 8, no. 2 (2010): 111-128. Accessed December 30, 2017. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid= 1&sid=bba08f9b-4c7e-4f99-9755-a9afd4e9e740%40sessionmgr4006.
  14. Khir, Bustami M. “The Qur’ān and Science: The Debate on the Validity of Scientific Interpretations.” Journal of Qur’ānic Studies 2, no. 2 (2000): 19–35. www.jstor.org/ stable/25727996.
  15. Mir, Mustansir. “Scientific Exegesis of the Qur’ān – A Viable Project?” Islam & Science 2, no. 1 (2004): 1-5. Accessed October 30, 2017. http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.csu. edu.au/ps/i.do?p=EAIM&sw=w&u=csu_au&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA119627485&as id=0096a7a8058640263d478eb201919bfa.
  16. Philips, Abu Ameenah. Usool at-Tafseer: The Methodology of Qur’ānic Interpretation. Riyadh: International Islamic Publishing House, n.d. http://kalamullah.com/Books/ Usool%20at-Tafseer.pdf.
  17. Pink, Johanna. “Tradition, Authority and Innovation in Contemporary Sunnī Tafsir: Towards a Typology of Qur’ān Commentaries from the Arab World, Indonesia and Turkey.” Journal of Qur’ānic Studies 12, no. 1-2 (2010): 56-82, doi: 10.3366/jqs.2010.0105.
  18. Qadhi, A. A. Yasir. An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’aan. Birmingham: Al-Hidaayah Publishing and Distribution, 1999. https://www.kalamullah.com/Books/ Introduction-to-Sciences-of-theQuran.pdf.
  19. Rahman, Fazlur. Major Themes of the Qur’an. Minneapolis, MN: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1980. Saeed, Abdullah. The Qur’ān: An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2008. http://mrofiq.staff.umy.ac.id/files/2013/09/Abdullah_Saeed_Introduction_to_the_Quran.pdf.
  20. Saeed, Abdullah. Interpreting the Quran: Towards a Contemporary Approach. New York: Routledge, 2006. https://www.humanrights.ch/upload/pdf/151105_Interpreting_the_ Quran.pdf.
  21. Sirry, Mun’im. “The Qur’ān and Modern Tafsīr.” In Scriptural Polemics: The Qur’ān and Other Religions, by Mun’im Sirry, 1-36. USA: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2014. Accessed November 2, 2017. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359363.003.0002.
  22. Suyuti, Jalaluddin D. Al-Itqan fi ulum al-Qur’ān. Translated by Darul Isha’at. Karachi: Darul Isha’at, 2008. https://archive.org/details/AlItqanFiUloomIlQuran.
  23. Syahnan.Mohummad. “A Study of Syyid Qutb’s Quran Exegesis in Earlier and Later Editions of his Fi Zilal Al-Quran with Specific Reference to Selected Themes.” PhD diss., McGill University, 1997. http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_ id=27972&local_base=GEN01-MCG02.
  24. Von Denffer, Ahmad. Ulum al-Qur’ān: An Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’ān. Nigeria: The Islamic Foundation, 2011.
  25. Wielandt, Rotraud. “Exegesis of the Qur’ān: Early Modern and Contemporary.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qur’ān, edited by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, page range. Washington DC: Georgetown University, 2008. Accessed February 11, 2008. http://www.brillonline.nl/subscriber/entry?entry=q3_COM-00059.
  26. Wood, Kurt. “The Scientific Exegesis of the Qur’ān: A Systematic Look.” MAAS Journal of Islamic Science 5, no. 2 (1989): 7-22.
  27. Zebiri, Kate. “The Emergence of Modern Tafsīr.” In Maḥmūd Shalt’ut and Islamic Modernism, by Kate Zebiri, 1-18. USA: Oxford Scholarship Online, 1993. Accessed November 12, 2017. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198263302.003.0007.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.